In the entertainment industry sometimes anything goes. The psychology seems to be: say/do anything sensational that could grab a headline or draw attention. This is the entire philosophy behind the Heidi/Spencer phenomenon.
As most know, many actors and musicians are more likely to vote democrat than republican. Unfortunately, many of these actors and musicians like to take controversial stands that alienate their fanbase. The Dixie Chicks and their comments overseas apologizing for our country were widely regarded as un-American. Some things you just don’t do.
Another example, Matt Damon referring to Sarah Palin and her family as a bad Disney movie. Jane Fonda overtly trying to appease the North Vietnamese. And more recently, David Letterman and his comments about rape in regards to Sarah Palin’s 14 year old daughter, Willow.
Many Sarah Palin fans watch David Letterman and Matt Damon on TV and movies. Many conservative women bought and used Jane Fonda’s fitness routine.The Dixie Chicks have had a huge following of conservative country music fans.
So, why would these people take the overt stands they do on certain issues? In my view they have made a strategic decision to appease one group while alienating another. In return for a more rabid core group of fans they insult another group of fans. This insult also grabs headlines and promotes who they are and what they do.
Is this smart? Giving up what could be millions of dollars in ratings, movie tickets, and album sales, to make a political or sensational statement?
I can see a reason to do it that doesn’t have to do with ego or insults. A tribe of followers is sometimes more valuable than wide appeal.
